Would Saddam Hussein be More Valuable Alive?

Two new anti-death penalty takes (at least for me).

I’ve heard two takes today on why Saddam Hussein would be more valuable to the world alive today than dead. The first was from Christopher Hitchens being interviews on Laura Ingraham’s radio show where he said Saddam could have provided information on where missing Iraqi family members have been buried. Makes sense. But he also may have revealed some of America’s skeletons from the years when Saddam was a friend. Such a good friend that we provided him with satellite photos that may have helped him drop poison gas on Kurds and Iranians.

And the second comes from Richard Dawkins , who thinks historians and psychologists would have learned a lot about what makes dictator’s tick:

“Political scientists of the future, studying the processes by which unscrupulous leaders arise and take over national institutions, have now lost key evidence forever. But perhaps the most important research in which a living Saddam Hussein could have helped is psychological. Most people can’t even come close to understanding how any man could be so cruel as Hitler or Saddam Hussein, or how such transparently evil monsters could secure sufficient support to take over an entire country. What were the formative influences on these men? Was it something in their childhood that turned them bad? In their genes? In their testosterone levels? Could the danger have been nipped in the bud by an alert psychiatrist before it was too late? How would Hitler, or Saddam Hussein have responded to a different style of education? We don’t have a clear answer to these questions. We need to do the research.

Makes sense to me. If we want to help prevent evil dictators in the future, studying today’s evil dictators in captivity may help determine what motivates them and what could be done to stop them.

BTW, Laura Ingraham, for those of you who don’t listen to right-wing radio, is the author of Shut up and Sing, a Dixie Chicks and Hollywood bashing book. Going on almost four years after Natalie Maines spoke up about her lack of support for George W. Bush on the eve the Iraq war, Ingraham continues to try to think having an opinion is un-American while starting a war based on false pretenses leading to the deaths of thousands in somehow patriotic.

Saddam’s Dead. Do You Feel Safer?

The only time I truly felt threatened by Saddam Hussein was when Colin Powell went to the United Nations and lied about weapons of mass destruction. If it wasn’t for Powell’s compelling yet completely dishonest presentation to the United Nations, I don’t believe we would have invaded Iraq.

Colin Powell, I hold you personally responsible for the death of every American soldier who’s died in Iraq and the deaths of tens of thousands of Iraqi citizens.
Had Powell not lied to the United Nations, there’s a very good chance that Saddam Hussein would still be alive. While I’m pretty indifferent to the health of Hussein, I think it’s dispicable that 3,000 American soldiers have lost their lives in a trumped up war justified by making Saddam Hussein seem like an imminent threat to America. We now know that we were fed a load of crap, yet more soldiers will die tommorrow, the day after tomorrow, and the day after that. In fact, our president would like to increase then number of American soldiers in harm’s way.

Would Saddam have been a threat to America if we surrounded Iraq militarily, put sanctions on the country, and built up a world-wide coalition of countries opposed to any aggresive moves by Iraq? Of course not. And this could have been done without dropping a single bomb. Without sacrificing a single soldier’s life. But it would have involved maturity beyond the capability of our current president.
Do I feel better knowing Saddam Hussein is dead? Absolutely not. He presented no threat to me sitting in jail, so killing him simply makes a martyr out of him leading to even more hostility against the United States.