Sen. John Marty Explains His Vikings Stadium Proposal

State Senator John Marty came out with a bi-partisan proposal today offering a fiscally responsible solution to the ongoing Vikings stadium issue. While it doesn’t give Zygi Wilf the 400 acres of land in Arden Hills so Wilf can fulfill his dream of owning a 21,000 car parking lot, it does provide a fiscally responsible solution to the stadium debate.

Additionally, it shows that Sen. Marty has taking this issue seriously, have been studying it for months (actually, for years, since he’s in his 8th term), and understands the numbers involved. The reality of the proposal the Vikings are pushing is that it’s far more money than the state can, or should, be willing to pay in this fiscal climate (frankly, in any fiscal climate).

Let’s Inject Fiscal Sanity into Stadium Debate

by Senator John Marty
October 21, 2011

Zygi Wilf and the Vikings are attempting to make their Ramsey County stadium deal sound like a run-of-the-mill, routine proposal. It is not. The Vikings are asking for the #1, all-time, biggest taxpayer subsidy of any sports franchise anywhere in American history!

At a time when many families are struggling to pay their bills, the Vikings and their political allies want Minnesotans to put up more taxpayer money than any other community ever – think about that – to subsidize a team owner.

I joined with Rep. Linda Runbeck to offer a bipartisan alternative: give the Metrodome to the Vikings in exchange for a 25 year contract to play in Minnesota. This proposal does not require any public funding. No Ramsey County sales tax, no Ramsey County automobile tax, and no state taxes or “fees” or “other revenues.” Taxpayers would be fully compensated for the value of the Metrodome through property taxes, from which the Vikings are currently exempted.

In contrast, the Vikings’ Arden Hills proposal requires $350 million from Ramsey County taxpayers, $300 million more from still-to-be-determined state taxes, plus $15 million from the Metro Sports Facilities Commission, and a sales tax break on construction materials (that’s an additional $19 – $30 million public subsidy), plus a property tax exemption that is worth several million dollars year after year.

Giving the Metrodome to the Vikings is not a perfect solution, but one that reflects fiscal responsibility and fairness for both the Vikings and the taxpayers of Minnesota. We are by no means alone in wanting a fair resolution. Minnesota voters oppose the use of public money for a new Vikings’ stadium by more than 3 to 1 (22% favor using public funds, 74% oppose). Yet the Ramsey County Board and some state officials are talking seriously of a taxpayer subsidy of over $650 million.

Of course the Vikings’ initial reaction to our proposal has not been favorable – who wouldn’t prefer a $700 million handout? Recognizing that 3 of every 4 Minnesotans reject any subsidy for the Vikings, state leaders should remove the Ramsey County proposal from the table. At that point, when the Vikings conduct an honest assessment of the Metrodome proposal, they will understand the fairness of our offer.

The Vikings first response to our proposal was to call it a “non-starter”. But things do change. Last week, Christian Ponder was a “non-starter” as Vikings Quarterback. This week he is a starter. The Vikings need to take another look here.

The only reason any politicians are even considering a $ 650 million tax subsidy for the Vikings is the possibility that the Vikings could move to Los Angeles. But Vikings’ owner Zygi Wilf has staked his personal integrity on that matter.

Making it clear that what is most important to him is his family’s integrity, he promised to keep the team in Minnesota forever: “From day one. I have promised that I would keep the team here in Minnesota forever.” When questioned if he plans to keep the team here, whether we have a new stadium or not: “Yes, I’ve stated that from day one.. all I can tell you is this, that I live by my commitment.”

Because some, who claim to be his allies, think he will break his promise, let’s compare this Metrodome transfer proposal to the Los Angeles options. The best of the Los Angeles stadium proposals is to give Zygi Wilf the land on which to build his own stadium, at his expense. We would give him the land with a stadium already on it, and he could improve, enhance, or rebuild it as he desires.

Los Angeles offers no public subsidy. We offer no public subsidy.

This Minnesota option is a reasonable, competitive alternative. And, under our proposal Wilf avoids a $250+ million NFL “relocation fee”, and he gets to keep his integrity and a truly loyal fan base.

At a time when most Americans, including people from Occupy Wall St and the Tea Party, are angry at outrageous corporate bailouts, some politicians want to force Minnesotans to pay for the biggest corporate subsidy in sports history. That’s incredible.

It’s time to inject some fiscal sanity into the stadium debate.

To get more of a feel for where Sen. Marty is coming from, check out this post he wrote back on May 6th, where he talked about the absurdity of even considering using the public’s money to build NFL stadiums at a time when we are cutting schools, transportation, and health care.

Here is what I like about this proposal: he uses numbers.

Numbers to explain how horrible the current Arden Hills Wilfare plan really is. In fact, it brings out numbers I haven’t seen before, such as the sales tax break on construction materials, which increases the Wilfare total to nearly $700 billion.

And Marty uses numbers to explain why giving away dozens of acres of downtown Minneapolis is a fiscally feasible way to provide a venue for the team. He doesn’t even go into the other benefits of that location that I suppose we take for granted compared to the Arden Hills location, such as being an LRT stop, having existing parking that can be leveraged rather than building acres and acres of parking for 8 days per year, and being near Minneapolis’ existing hotels, the convention center, and entertainment district.

Numbers are a good thing. It’s much better than saying “Get er done!” or “The team is an asset to the state.” That’s fine, but it doesn’t pay for a stadium. So, either start writing checks to Wilf or start asking people other than the general public to do so, such as Vikings season ticket holders through Personal Seat Licenses, Vikings license plates, and ticket surcharges.

Frankly, if Vikings fans aren’t willing to pay what it takes to keep the Vikings in Minnesota, why should the general public?

2 thoughts on “Sen. John Marty Explains His Vikings Stadium Proposal”

  1. I find it to be an accurate statement of global social commentary–that a ‘fiscally sane’ proposal is immediately assessed as a ‘non-starter’ by people.

    Pretty much explains how bad leadership is when ‘fiscally sane’ proposals cannot find more traction…and I don’t mean just with Zygi since of course he is distracted by the profit potential of one of the greatest land grabs in the state of MN in 25 years or more. And of course Viking fanboys can’t be relied upon for thoughtful fiscally sane analysis.

    Where are the rest of our civic leaders on this stadium issues? Now is the time to step forward and be heard, or be prepared to have ‘civic leader’ from your future introductions.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *