<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How IKEA Helps Make Facebook Less Valuable</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedeets.com/2009/11/25/how-ikea-helps-make-facebook-less-valuable/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedeets.com/2009/11/25/how-ikea-helps-make-facebook-less-valuable/</link>
	<description>Consistently against torture.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:23:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don’t Sellout Your Friends &#124; Toronto Internet Marketing &#124; Toronto Web Design Firm</title>
		<link>http://www.thedeets.com/2009/11/25/how-ikea-helps-make-facebook-less-valuable/#comment-16664</link>
		<dc:creator>Don’t Sellout Your Friends &#124; Toronto Internet Marketing &#124; Toronto Web Design Firm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 00:22:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedeets.com/?p=5846#comment-16664</guid>
		<description>[...] furniture brand IKEA also got into the mix of manipulating Facebook with a giveaway to promote the opening of a new store. They posted photos of the new IKEA’s showrooms to Facebook and encouraged people to use a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] furniture brand IKEA also got into the mix of manipulating Facebook with a giveaway to promote the opening of a new store. They posted photos of the new IKEA’s showrooms to Facebook and encouraged people to use a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roundup: The Power of Social Media &#8212; Secrets of the City &#8212; Minneapolis + St. Paul</title>
		<link>http://www.thedeets.com/2009/11/25/how-ikea-helps-make-facebook-less-valuable/#comment-16569</link>
		<dc:creator>Roundup: The Power of Social Media &#8212; Secrets of the City &#8212; Minneapolis + St. Paul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 14:09:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedeets.com/?p=5846#comment-16569</guid>
		<description>[...] According to The Deets, IKEA has made Facebook less valuable by exploiting its photo tagging functionality to promote the opening of another store. How did they do it? Easy. They encouraged Facebook users to tag themselves within photos that they don’t actually appear in, in order to win IKEA merchandise. Tag yourself in a photo of an IKEA tablecloth, and win that tablecloth. Get it? The idea is that all your Facebook friends will click through the photo to see it. An ingenious tactic, or a Facebook nono? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] According to The Deets, IKEA has made Facebook less valuable by exploiting its photo tagging functionality to promote the opening of another store. How did they do it? Easy. They encouraged Facebook users to tag themselves within photos that they don’t actually appear in, in order to win IKEA merchandise. Tag yourself in a photo of an IKEA tablecloth, and win that tablecloth. Get it? The idea is that all your Facebook friends will click through the photo to see it. An ingenious tactic, or a Facebook nono? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryanl</title>
		<link>http://www.thedeets.com/2009/11/25/how-ikea-helps-make-facebook-less-valuable/#comment-16559</link>
		<dc:creator>ryanl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Nov 2009 21:45:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedeets.com/?p=5846#comment-16559</guid>
		<description>Too each their own.  I find this particular example fairly innocuous.  To me this is nothing compared to all the game spam that pervades facebook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Too each their own.  I find this particular example fairly innocuous.  To me this is nothing compared to all the game spam that pervades facebook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ed Kohler</title>
		<link>http://www.thedeets.com/2009/11/25/how-ikea-helps-make-facebook-less-valuable/#comment-16537</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Kohler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 02:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedeets.com/?p=5846#comment-16537</guid>
		<description>@Chase, I&#039;m not opposed to advertising. In fact, I&#039;m probably more pro-advertising than most when it&#039;s done well. Relevant ads, to me, come close to being considered content, as we see when people who haven&#039;t purchased a newspaper all year pick up the Thanksgiving Day edition for the Black Friday ads that happen to have some journalism wrapped around them. 

Figuring out clever ways to spread the word can also be a very good thing. I just happen to prefer clever organic and clever cool over clever manipulative. Clever organic would involve creating something that&#039;s worth talking about. Promotions that get people talking without paying people - through outright payments for tweets, blogs, Facebook updates, etc., or through contest entries - are what I like to see. Obviously, it&#039;s harder to create something people want to talk about than it is to pay them to pimp your stuff to their networks of Facebook friends and Twitter followers, but harder is definitely better in this case.

When I receive tweets, Facebook updates, or other forms of commercial messages from friends that are based on some form of compensation, I think less of my friend for wasting my time and the company who stooped to the level of paying (cash, product, or contest entries) to have my time wasted. 

To me, this is a becoming significant problem. I know quite a few people that I find interesting, but not interesting enough to want to deal with the noise in their Twitter and Facebook streams caused by participation in contests to win crap through retweet spam. To make Twitter valuable to me, I&#039;m forced to use it less than I otherwise would if it wasn&#039;t being exploited by advertisers. If the noise gets high enough, I&#039;m sure people would eventually decide to tune out of the service altogether, although it&#039;s likely that someone would figure out how to filter out any mentions of contest entry tweets in order to return value to the service. A Tivo for Twitter, in a sense.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Chase, I&#8217;m not opposed to advertising. In fact, I&#8217;m probably more pro-advertising than most when it&#8217;s done well. Relevant ads, to me, come close to being considered content, as we see when people who haven&#8217;t purchased a newspaper all year pick up the Thanksgiving Day edition for the Black Friday ads that happen to have some journalism wrapped around them. </p>
<p>Figuring out clever ways to spread the word can also be a very good thing. I just happen to prefer clever organic and clever cool over clever manipulative. Clever organic would involve creating something that&#8217;s worth talking about. Promotions that get people talking without paying people &#8211; through outright payments for tweets, blogs, Facebook updates, etc., or through contest entries &#8211; are what I like to see. Obviously, it&#8217;s harder to create something people want to talk about than it is to pay them to pimp your stuff to their networks of Facebook friends and Twitter followers, but harder is definitely better in this case.</p>
<p>When I receive tweets, Facebook updates, or other forms of commercial messages from friends that are based on some form of compensation, I think less of my friend for wasting my time and the company who stooped to the level of paying (cash, product, or contest entries) to have my time wasted. </p>
<p>To me, this is a becoming significant problem. I know quite a few people that I find interesting, but not interesting enough to want to deal with the noise in their Twitter and Facebook streams caused by participation in contests to win crap through retweet spam. To make Twitter valuable to me, I&#8217;m forced to use it less than I otherwise would if it wasn&#8217;t being exploited by advertisers. If the noise gets high enough, I&#8217;m sure people would eventually decide to tune out of the service altogether, although it&#8217;s likely that someone would figure out how to filter out any mentions of contest entry tweets in order to return value to the service. A Tivo for Twitter, in a sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chase Turner</title>
		<link>http://www.thedeets.com/2009/11/25/how-ikea-helps-make-facebook-less-valuable/#comment-16533</link>
		<dc:creator>Chase Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2009 00:24:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedeets.com/?p=5846#comment-16533</guid>
		<description>Interesting take, as a marketer I sometimes forget that I&#039;m looking at things such as this through a particular set of lenses. Do you dislike all advertising on social networking sites, or just clever ones that eliminate the need to pay for the space?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting take, as a marketer I sometimes forget that I&#8217;m looking at things such as this through a particular set of lenses. Do you dislike all advertising on social networking sites, or just clever ones that eliminate the need to pay for the space?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- Quick Cache: failed to write cache. The cache/ directory is either non-existent ( and could not be created ) or it is not writable. -->
