<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Target&#8217;s New Editorial Role at the StarTribune</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedeets.com/2008/08/15/targets-new-editorial-role-at-the-startribune/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedeets.com/2008/08/15/targets-new-editorial-role-at-the-startribune/</link>
	<description>Consistently against torture.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 21:36:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: robin marty</title>
		<link>http://www.thedeets.com/2008/08/15/targets-new-editorial-role-at-the-startribune/#comment-5825</link>
		<dc:creator>robin marty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 16:33:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedeets.com/?p=2114#comment-5825</guid>
		<description>not to be a target defender or anything, but maybe it just got too big?  My guess is if it did they&#039;d pull instead of close to save bandwidth.  I&#039;ve never seen a thread make it past 200 comments there before.  God knows their technical team isn&#039;t the brightest...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not to be a target defender or anything, but maybe it just got too big?  My guess is if it did they&#8217;d pull instead of close to save bandwidth.  I&#8217;ve never seen a thread make it past 200 comments there before.  God knows their technical team isn&#8217;t the brightest&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa</title>
		<link>http://www.thedeets.com/2008/08/15/targets-new-editorial-role-at-the-startribune/#comment-5818</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 17 Aug 2008 23:12:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedeets.com/?p=2114#comment-5818</guid>
		<description>They must&#039;ve finally hired some folks to tend to those pesky, blog-related issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They must&#8217;ve finally hired some folks to tend to those pesky, blog-related issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kohler</title>
		<link>http://www.thedeets.com/2008/08/15/targets-new-editorial-role-at-the-startribune/#comment-5814</link>
		<dc:creator>kohler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 15:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedeets.com/?p=2114#comment-5814</guid>
		<description>Taylor, that justifies pulling 90% of the StarTribune&#039;s threads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Taylor, that justifies pulling 90% of the StarTribune&#8217;s threads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: taylor</title>
		<link>http://www.thedeets.com/2008/08/15/targets-new-editorial-role-at-the-startribune/#comment-5813</link>
		<dc:creator>taylor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 13:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedeets.com/?p=2114#comment-5813</guid>
		<description>I doubt Target had anything to do with it, the STrib probably just didn&#039;t want to continue the muck on that thread.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I doubt Target had anything to do with it, the STrib probably just didn&#8217;t want to continue the muck on that thread.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Brauer</title>
		<link>http://www.thedeets.com/2008/08/15/targets-new-editorial-role-at-the-startribune/#comment-5812</link>
		<dc:creator>David Brauer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Aug 2008 03:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedeets.com/?p=2114#comment-5812</guid>
		<description>Any online whiz have access to an archive with the critical comments pre-doinkage?

The Strib does pull back comment threads on occasion, so this is not unprecedented in the abstract. Of course, it&#039;s quite likely this is about protecting Target, but having the record would be good.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any online whiz have access to an archive with the critical comments pre-doinkage?</p>
<p>The Strib does pull back comment threads on occasion, so this is not unprecedented in the abstract. Of course, it&#8217;s quite likely this is about protecting Target, but having the record would be good.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- Quick Cache: failed to write cache. The cache/ directory is either non-existent ( and could not be created ) or it is not writable. -->
