[ # ] What Will Porn Actresses Do?
June 5th, 2008 under Porn

The Long Tail of Porn.

What Porn Actresses Will Do
Larger version.

I was doing some research on a porn talent agency’s website the other day when I discovered a really cool interface that allows users to filter the actresses based on what sex acts they’re willing to do on film.

There were 901 actresses in the system. Toggling on/off the buttons for various sex acts showed what these ladies are willing to do. I kept a log of how many actresses would do each sex act then ranked the popularity of each act to create the chart displayed above.

A few things I learned:

1. “Solo” is obviously number one. You have to be willing to take off your clothes to be in porn.

2. “Girl / Girl” outranks “Girl / Boy” See, it’s hard being a guy.

3. While G/G beat G/B, B/B/G beat G/G/B. Who knew?

4. Second least popular sex act: Acting!

5. No girl does everything.

That’s all the analysis I’m going to provide on the off chance that I decide to run for senate some day.

Raw data:

Book recommendation: How to Make Love Like a Porn Star by Jenna Jameson


Related Posts

  • Porn Ratio
  • Top-10 Representative Posts on The Deets
  • Kosher Porn is Not “Kosher” with Kosher Crowd
  • Dirty Ashcroft
  • What’s in that Video Lease Building?
  • Read the Comments

    [ # 5481 ] Comment from The Other Mike [June 5, 2008, 2:55 pm]

    I’m wondering about the 26 actresses who won’t do ’solo’
    …spotlight bother them?
    …worried about going blind?
    …performance pressure too high?

    [ # 5482 ] Comment from Taylor [June 5, 2008, 3:45 pm]

    “I was doing some research on a porn talent agency’s website the other day…”

    The mystery of What Does Ed Do grows ever more mysterious.

    [ # 5485 ] Comment from RoboSheep [June 5, 2008, 5:23 pm]

    Taylor hit the nail on the head with this one.

    [ # 5487 ] Comment from The Other Mike [June 5, 2008, 10:13 pm]

    Com’n Taylor and Robo…I’m calling b.s. on your comments, because no one who knows the Deets would feel these research topic would be ‘mysterious’ for him.

    Growth in envy is believable, but the false surprise over his range of ‘work’ sets off the b.s. meter.

    [ # 5488 ] Comment from The Other Mike [June 5, 2008, 10:15 pm]

    I suppose I should have stayed on topic and accused you both of ‘faking it’.

    [ # 5489 ] Comment from RoboSheep [June 5, 2008, 10:36 pm]

    Saw through the acting huh? I guess there’s good reason that ranks second from the bottom. :P

    [ # 5491 ] Pingback from Links for 6.6.08: Music’s savior, Twitter fakesters, Weezer manga… « the listenerd [June 6, 2008, 7:51 am]

    [...] topic: The Deets crunches the numbers on the long tail of pornography. (The previous sentence contained no intentional double [...]

    [ # 5500 ] Pingback from Filisteu » Blog Archive » Dois itens sobre sexo [June 11, 2008, 1:39 pm]

    [...] usou uma lista de atrizes pornôs para descobrir o que as profissionais da agência estão ou não dispostas a fazer na frente das câmeras. Digo que é um bom exemplo de metodologia porque a fonte dos dados é boa: as atrizes têm os [...]

    [ # 5501 ] Pingback from Fleshbot loves Minnesotans; Or, Minnesotans love porn and finally someone noticed » smoothangied [June 11, 2008, 5:33 pm]

    [...] week Ed was doing some research on a porn talent agency’s website. Why? Who knows, he’s Ed. While conducting his [...]

    [ # 5781 ] Pingback from Top-10 Representative Posts on The Deets | The Deets [August 8, 2008, 11:00 am]

    [...] Carly suggested to me once that I include links to some of the top posts that have appears on The Deets. I thought that was a pretty good idea, but then I looked at my stats and realized that top posts, at least when measured by page views, don’t necessarily provide a good illustration of what people will find on The Deets on a typical day. For example, the above graph shows a big spike in traffic for June 2008. Why? Porn. [...]

    Write a comment