<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ranking The Rake&#8217;s Rankings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedeets.com/2008/02/25/ranking-the-rakes-rankings/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedeets.com/2008/02/25/ranking-the-rakes-rankings/</link>
	<description>Consistently against torture.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:23:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: kohler</title>
		<link>http://www.thedeets.com/2008/02/25/ranking-the-rakes-rankings/#comment-4771</link>
		<dc:creator>kohler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 07:41:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedeets.com/2008/02/25/ranking-the-rakes-rankings/#comment-4771</guid>
		<description>I think the context of The Rake&#039;s online list had a slightly different meaning than the print version based on how it was presented based on what I gathered from Christina&#039;s comments on MNSpeak.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the context of The Rake&#8217;s online list had a slightly different meaning than the print version based on how it was presented based on what I gathered from Christina&#8217;s comments on MNSpeak.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Gisleson</title>
		<link>http://www.thedeets.com/2008/02/25/ranking-the-rakes-rankings/#comment-4770</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Gisleson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 05:06:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedeets.com/2008/02/25/ranking-the-rakes-rankings/#comment-4770</guid>
		<description>More to the point, I should have said I don&#039;t think The Rake understood those things.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More to the point, I should have said I don&#8217;t think The Rake understood those things.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kohler</title>
		<link>http://www.thedeets.com/2008/02/25/ranking-the-rakes-rankings/#comment-4766</link>
		<dc:creator>kohler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 20:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedeets.com/2008/02/25/ranking-the-rakes-rankings/#comment-4766</guid>
		<description>More specifically, Technorati is measuring Technorati pinged (but not necessarily registered) blogs. 

And yes, that&#039;s not necessarily a measure of traffic or influence as you point out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More specifically, Technorati is measuring Technorati pinged (but not necessarily registered) blogs. </p>
<p>And yes, that&#8217;s not necessarily a measure of traffic or influence as you point out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Gisleson</title>
		<link>http://www.thedeets.com/2008/02/25/ranking-the-rakes-rankings/#comment-4765</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Gisleson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 20:07:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedeets.com/2008/02/25/ranking-the-rakes-rankings/#comment-4765</guid>
		<description>Ditto what Cristina said. I don&#039;t think you understand Technorati very well. They&#039;re only measuring response from Technorati-registered blogs. If you really want to crunch this data, you need to do an advanced Google search on each site, omitting their own URLs. Have fun with that project.

Btw, by your criteria, Norwegianity outranks Cursor, yet Cursor has 20x my traffic. And for those who don&#039;t &quot;get&quot; Cursor, well, I guess you had to be there when they started and nothing else was out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ditto what Cristina said. I don&#8217;t think you understand Technorati very well. They&#8217;re only measuring response from Technorati-registered blogs. If you really want to crunch this data, you need to do an advanced Google search on each site, omitting their own URLs. Have fun with that project.</p>
<p>Btw, by your criteria, Norwegianity outranks Cursor, yet Cursor has 20x my traffic. And for those who don&#8217;t &#8220;get&#8221; Cursor, well, I guess you had to be there when they started and nothing else was out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Freets</title>
		<link>http://www.thedeets.com/2008/02/25/ranking-the-rakes-rankings/#comment-4743</link>
		<dc:creator>The Freets</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Feb 2008 13:37:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedeets.com/2008/02/25/ranking-the-rakes-rankings/#comment-4743</guid>
		<description>Great Jane! Love the Villager, keep up the great work! I know Ed loves it too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Jane! Love the Villager, keep up the great work! I know Ed loves it too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- Quick Cache: failed to write cache. The cache/ directory is either non-existent ( and could not be created ) or it is not writable. -->
