<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sisterhood of the Traveling Bra</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thedeets.com/2007/11/09/sisterhood-of-the-traveling-bra/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thedeets.com/2007/11/09/sisterhood-of-the-traveling-bra/</link>
	<description>Consistently against torture.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 14:49:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tide&#8217;s New Anti-Clothes Washing Campaign &#187; The Deets - Ed Kohler's Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.thedeets.com/2007/11/09/sisterhood-of-the-traveling-bra/comment-page-1/#comment-3453</link>
		<dc:creator>Tide&#8217;s New Anti-Clothes Washing Campaign &#187; The Deets - Ed Kohler's Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 19:18:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedeets.com/2007/11/09/sisterhood-of-the-traveling-bra/#comment-3453</guid>
		<description>[...] Erica on Sisterhood of the Traveling Bra [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Erica on Sisterhood of the Traveling Bra [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erica</title>
		<link>http://www.thedeets.com/2007/11/09/sisterhood-of-the-traveling-bra/comment-page-1/#comment-3446</link>
		<dc:creator>Erica</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2007 15:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedeets.com/2007/11/09/sisterhood-of-the-traveling-bra/#comment-3446</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s bad enough trying a bra on in the first place. I&#039;m not going to put the girls in a bra that so many other people have handled! Over the clothes is not so bad, though. Still, eesh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s bad enough trying a bra on in the first place. I&#8217;m not going to put the girls in a bra that so many other people have handled! Over the clothes is not so bad, though. Still, eesh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Other Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.thedeets.com/2007/11/09/sisterhood-of-the-traveling-bra/comment-page-1/#comment-3430</link>
		<dc:creator>The Other Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Nov 2007 17:48:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedeets.com/2007/11/09/sisterhood-of-the-traveling-bra/#comment-3430</guid>
		<description>Hmm, how about a little YouTube-ish video of me lifting this shirt out of the package with a stick, dipping it into a bonfire, and dancing around it until I fall down?  

I&#039;m thinking it is a traffic generating machine, viral even!  It will become a Wiccan power ceremony or such, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, how about a little YouTube-ish video of me lifting this shirt out of the package with a stick, dipping it into a bonfire, and dancing around it until I fall down?  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m thinking it is a traffic generating machine, viral even!  It will become a Wiccan power ceremony or such, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike N.</title>
		<link>http://www.thedeets.com/2007/11/09/sisterhood-of-the-traveling-bra/comment-page-1/#comment-3386</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike N.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Nov 2007 00:36:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedeets.com/2007/11/09/sisterhood-of-the-traveling-bra/#comment-3386</guid>
		<description>Alright, Ed, The Other Mike, Gabe, Kirk, Nathan, and you other lads: keep an eye on your mailbox.  I&#039;m sending one of you guys a nasty old, tight-fitting red t-shirt with honey stains.

What I want you to do is take a picture of you it &quot;Pooh style&quot; and send the pics too me, mail the shirt to another blogger and we&#039;ll have our own &quot;traveling bra&#039; show.&quot;

Or maybe this is a bad idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alright, Ed, The Other Mike, Gabe, Kirk, Nathan, and you other lads: keep an eye on your mailbox.  I&#8217;m sending one of you guys a nasty old, tight-fitting red t-shirt with honey stains.</p>
<p>What I want you to do is take a picture of you it &#8220;Pooh style&#8221; and send the pics too me, mail the shirt to another blogger and we&#8217;ll have our own &#8220;traveling bra&#8217; show.&#8221;</p>
<p>Or maybe this is a bad idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Other Mike</title>
		<link>http://www.thedeets.com/2007/11/09/sisterhood-of-the-traveling-bra/comment-page-1/#comment-3381</link>
		<dc:creator>The Other Mike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 21:25:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thedeets.com/2007/11/09/sisterhood-of-the-traveling-bra/#comment-3381</guid>
		<description>I was &#039;moved&#039; enough to wonder that too Gabe, so I clicked the link, and found the original &#039;photo&#039; is actually more of a sketch of a woman, and the bra is actually worn on the outside of her outfit (even in a sketch!)

So, as far as provocative statements go...it is pretty child-safe, which at some point, makes it pretty ho-hum.  I mean, I suppose it is still &#039;one for the sisterhood&#039; and at least does not break all rules of sensible hygiene, but ends up far enough on the milquetoast side of edginess as to be more a tease rather than a statement.

But, on the positive side, at least it is not mini-porn.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was &#8216;moved&#8217; enough to wonder that too Gabe, so I clicked the link, and found the original &#8216;photo&#8217; is actually more of a sketch of a woman, and the bra is actually worn on the outside of her outfit (even in a sketch!)</p>
<p>So, as far as provocative statements go&#8230;it is pretty child-safe, which at some point, makes it pretty ho-hum.  I mean, I suppose it is still &#8216;one for the sisterhood&#8217; and at least does not break all rules of sensible hygiene, but ends up far enough on the milquetoast side of edginess as to be more a tease rather than a statement.</p>
<p>But, on the positive side, at least it is not mini-porn.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
