Bookmarking Tools and Paid Archives Don't Mix

By Ed Kohler | Sep 11, 2007





Erica M from Minneapolis Metroblogging raises an interesting point about the stupidity of offering social bookmarking options for readers on sites where bookmarked content will soon be hidden behind paid archives:

Not-So-Permalinks

Can somebody explain to me the point of having that “save to del.icio.us” option (and Digg, and Reddit, and Newsvine, and Google Bookmarks, and really any bookmarking tool) on Strib and PiPress articles if the articles are only available for a couple of weeks?

Related to this, I consciously seek out news sources that don’t hide their archives from readers when picking sources for blog posts. I do this because linking to paid content sources – or sources requiring registration – is insulting to my future readers. People will continue to stumble upon articles I’ve written months or years go, and should be able to have the same experience with that article as someone reading it on the day it’s published.

For articles that really interest me on sites known to bury their archives, I’ve found myself switching from bookmarking articles that interest me to PDFing the articles and storing them locally.

Another option would be to copy/paste the article into a Google Doc.

]]>

Comment on this post

]]>

Book of the Month: The Perfect Thing: How the iPod Shuffles Commerce, Culture, and Coolness
Gadget of the Month: Apple MacBook Pro
Web Site of the Month: Dabble Video Search Engine
]]>


Leave a Comment

If you would like to make a comment, please fill out the form below.

Name (required)

Email (required)

Website

Comments


Related Posts

  • Yahoo Acquiring Del.ico.us Explained in 6 Easy Steps
  • U of MN Salaries
  • Google Gapminer
  • Don’t Leave Crap in the Car
  • Why Newspapers Don't Make More Money Online
  • © The Deets, - WordPress Themes by DBT