[ # ] This Blog is Rated PG
June 22nd, 2007 under -cat


Apparently, this blog is rated PG due to 6 mentions of “ass” and one of “fart.” Surely, I’ve said “fart” more than once, so that’s probably just counting what it found on the homepage.

What's My Blog Rated?

Maybe I’ve jumped to PG-13 after this post?



Related Posts

  • This Film Is Not Yet Rated Rocks
  • Worst Blog I’ve Ever Seen
  • Powerline Blog: Just ’cause Kos is Bigger Doesn’t Make Him More Influential, right?
  • Paul Krugman Has a New Blog
  • Splogging Kirk & Anne
  • Read the Comments

    [ # 2172 ] Comment from jeremy Elfering [June 22, 2007, 2:53 pm]

    no, I think it is pg because of the FUH2 photos

    [ # 2178 ] Comment from kohler [June 23, 2007, 12:26 am]

    Shouldn’t kids be exposed to the dangers of driving fuel inefficient oversized cars?

    [ # 2182 ] Comment from The Other Mike [June 23, 2007, 10:57 am]

    Hey Deets, you looking to bump this fucker up to an ‘R’ rating, shit man, we can do it; but if you are happy with PG-13, we can keep that effer right where it is, no crap man, we’re with you; but if you are going for the straight PG, it would be tough, but I imagine we could clean up our *expletive deleted* act, no dumping allowed here; but, I’m thinking you would have to put in some serious moderation on us commentators first…and get Carly to preview your posts. ;)

    Write a comment