[ # ] People who have abortions are losers. Just as a Seth Yantiss.
March 9th, 2006 under Abortion


Looks like I stirred the turd over at SayAnyThingBlog.com a bit. Seth Yantiss, who apparently is one of the site’s resident dittoheads, is taking talking points from the Scarlet Letter in his stance against abortion. Wouldn’t addressing the common reasons women have abortions (lack of health care, stable income, housing) be a better approach to preventing abortions than castigating women?

Do you get the impression that Yantiss would be the kind of guy who’d use any and all connections to try to get out of a speeding ticket, yet thinks other people need to take resonsibility for their actions . . . or else?

Say Anything: Parental Notification Law Causes Teen Abortion Rates To Drop In Texas - North Dakota’s Most Popular Political Blog

Seth Yantiss: Though it may sound mean, we should prop these people up as the losers they are and show all of our children the reasons NOT TO DO WHAT THEY HAVE DONE. These people would only server as an example to others on how not to live. The majority would get it faster, seeing the real world example of where being stupid gets you, and within a generation, fewer people would mimic the poor behavior. By coddling and apologizing for f-ups we tell the next generation that “it’s okay to screw up… someone will cover for you… don’t worry about it.”



Related Posts

  • Hey Bobby Eberle, Could We See Some More Honest Analysis?
  • Matt C. Abbot - Pro-War Catholic
  • False Claims On Abortion By Democrats
  • Information for Women in South-Wingukota
  • Cool Author Website
  • Read the Comments

    [ # 12 ] Comment from carol [March 10, 2006, 1:31 pm]

    Seth Yantiss is far from a loser. If the world were populated by more men like Seth and Rob we’d all be much better off. They are responsible fathers, sons, MEN

    [ # 13 ] Comment from Ed Kohler [March 10, 2006, 1:45 pm]

    Thanks for stopping by, Carol. If you read the post carefully, you’ll notice that I never referred to Seth Yantiss as a loser.

    Do you think Seth should decide what’s best for everyone in America?

    [ # 14 ] Comment from likwidshoe [March 10, 2006, 5:08 pm]

    Do you think Seth should decide what’s best for everyone in America?

    He’s not doing that.

    Man,..you sure change the subject when you’re losing an argument.

    You also avoid the truth.

    Your argument is a loser.

    [ # 15 ] Comment from Seth Yantiss [March 10, 2006, 8:32 pm]

    Ed,

    Why does my participation in the global debate constitute “[Me] deciding what’s best for America”?

    Are your not intending to be snarky? Or is it a general rule that liberals, when presented with the facts, can only result to defamations of character and/or context?

    Can you provide me with even one example of my being anything less than completely honest about my intellectual impressions and/or feelings on any subject?

    Yet you think I would use my “Connections” to get out of a ticket? We (my family and I) accidentally walked out of a petsmart last year with a cat collar we did not pay for. I noticed it when we got in the car. We all walked back into the store, stood in line, and paid for the collar. I have two kids. Children learn by example, and they learn by example well. I try to set that example. I strive for integrity in everything I do. My life’s only goal (unfortunately) is to live by the set of ethics that I have developed. Loosely based upon the principle of “Do unto others, as you would have done unto you”. I believe in Karma and the Atheistic view of “god is your subconscious”. I try to program myself with as many good deeds as is possible. I (WITHOUT FAIL) am a gentleman around women. I do this with my Karma, Subconscious, and children in mind.

    I would not and do not attempt to cheat on anything. I am brutally honest. F-U very much.

    But please, take it upon yourself to categorize me a “Nut” to hold the view that people should be responsible enough for their actions as to not lower the value of human life. The “Free and Fun Filled World of Abortion” lowers the value of human life. I would be against anti-abortion legislation if it was limited to rape victims, incest, endangerment, and a SMALL percentage of (OOPS). But NOOOOO, people have to use it like a fad. As a constant correction to the mistakes, when they know full well what the consequences might be. The result is a degradation of the value of the individual. A devaluation of humanity which will ultimately not lead to harmony. A decline in the abhorrence of abortion hardens our hearts towards others. The social-psychological ramifications of any decline in sympathy may well be enormous. Imagine a country that shrugs at victims of a hurricane. This could be yours with just a wit less compassion.

    ROE v WADE is bad law, BTW, as this is a STATE issue. As the country was designed, the states can vote on certain topics, and if *you* (the citizen) like that vote… you can move there.

    Eh… I’m done.

    [ # 16 ] Comment from Ed Kohler [March 10, 2006, 8:51 pm]

    Why does my participation in the global debate constitute “[Me] deciding what’s best for America”?

    Because you’re trying to mandate how other people should live their lives. You’re trying to make decisions that aren’t yours to make.

    Can you provide me with even one example of my being anything less than completely honest about my intellectual impressions and/or feelings on any subject?

    No.

    Yet you think I would use my “Connections” to get out of a ticket?

    Yes. Because my experiences tell me that most peoples beliefs don’t stand up to real-world tests. I’m glad to hear that you live by the golden rule. I do too. I don’t see why you need to swear to make your point.

    I don’t think you understand that I’m as much against abortions as you are, but still think they need to be legal and safely performed at times. Preventing pregnancies is the best form of abortion abatement.

    Maybe I’m wrong, but I think it’s safe to assume that a large percentage of women opting for abortions do not have the luxury of moving to another state.

    Sorry, but I have a hard time relating to the American Taliban. Prevention seems like a more viable solution than your Scarlet Letter approach to attacking women who decided they weren’t in a position to raise a child.

    [ # 17 ] Comment from Seth Yantiss [March 10, 2006, 9:56 pm]

    Prevention seems like a more viable solution than your Scarlet Letter approach to attacking women who decided they weren’t in a position to raise a child.

    I wouldn’t define my approach as “Scarlet Letter” -esque, I’m just saying stop making excuses for people when they make mistakes. Let them accept responsibility for their actions. Telling people abortions is okay, allows them to think it’s okay… do you see how that works? If I tell you, it’s okay to kill, then you kill, how can I then tell you it’s wrong?

    [ # 18 ] Comment from Seth Yantiss [March 10, 2006, 9:58 pm]

    But wait… If you agree with me, why would you berate my consternation of the action by dubbing the offenders as “Losers”?

    [ # 2000 ] Comment from Andy L. [May 5, 2007, 12:10 am]

    Hey. I’m a Native American from North Dakota. I’m here to let you know what’s going on at sayanythingblog.com. The fools, Rob Port, Likwidshoe, Whistler, Proof, Seth, etc. are in the fight of their lives.

    Rob Port wrote an article in the Dakota Beacon, titled “The Appalling State Of Our Indian Reservations”, January 2007 issue, page 10. The Dakota Beacon is a conservative republican publication with wide distribution accross the state. The article was demeaning and insulting to North Dakota Indians. Tribal members on my reservation, Turtle Mountains, found out about the article on April 24. Since then, the site has gotten pretty interesting.

    I don’t think Rob Port realized what he was in for when he decided to deride and attack Indians. Especially Turtle Mountain Indians, our enrollement is over 30,000.

    Well, anyway, the blogsters at that site have decided it is their duty to save Indians from themselves, fully acculturate and assimilate all, abolish reservations, abrogate treaties, the works. They’ve even gone as far as calling Indian women “Welfare Whores”, Indian Children “Bastards” and continuously stating that Indian people live off the “Government’s tit”. Sound familiar? Well, these characters have bitten off more than they can chew this time.

    Us Natives are new to the blog world. We catch on quickly. Suprised the assholes at sayverylittleblog.com!

    Anyway, if you’re interested, check out “When Internet Debate Gets Ugly and Bloggers Get Threatened”, april 30; “The Appalling State of Our Indian Reservations, Redux”, april 24; and “The Appalling State of Our Indian Reservations”, december 22.

    Pass the word, to as many as you can. any help? Have at it. Us Indians would sure appreciate it.

    [ # 2014 ] Comment from Andy L. [May 5, 2007, 5:43 pm]

    Hey, guess what? I got taken off of sayanythingblog.com! Apparently Rob Port and his marauders can’t take the heat when confronted by Indians. Talk about censorship. Now those idiots can talk about Indian women being “welfare whores”, Indian children being “bastards”, etc. likwidshoe counts as one of the most bigotted and racist contributors on that site. You guys should check it out. Hey, you know what would be a good idea? Start a thread about Rob Port and his racist agenda.

    Thanks again. Andy

    [ # 2031 ] Comment from Andy L. [May 6, 2007, 9:56 pm]

    There were enough complaints from off reservation bloggers, we got put back on. How long, I don’t know. Rob Port, such a racist. likwidshoe, same mold.

    [ # 2065 ] Comment from likwidshoe [May 16, 2007, 8:51 pm]

    Oh wow. We’ve got demented little fans. For the record, this Andy L. character believes that disagreement equals racism.

    To Andy - other bloggers don’t normally appreciate this behavior of yours. Going to another blog, digging up an old thread, and then talking about something that is completely off the subject is a major faux paux in the blogging world. Not to mention just downright rude.

    [ # 2066 ] Comment from Sparkie Arbuckle [May 18, 2007, 8:53 am]

    SETH SEZ
    Because you’re trying to mandate how other people should live their lives. You’re trying to make decisions that aren’t yours to make.

    …but that’s what Seth is doing. Nice clay pidgeon Seth. …let’s hear some more. Pull!

    [ # 2078 ] Comment from kohler [May 23, 2007, 8:08 pm]

    likwidshoe, if I had a problem with it, I wouldn’t have approved the comment. Either you failed to notice that you did the same thing you’re criticizing Andy for or enjoy leading a hypocritical lifestyle. Not sure.

    [ # 2080 ] Comment from Andy L. [May 24, 2007, 2:27 pm]

    Likwidshoe just enjoys living his hypocritical lifestyle. Thanks anyway. Andy

    [ # 2081 ] Comment from likwidshoe [May 26, 2007, 1:17 pm]

    kohler - likwidshoe, if I had a problem with it, I wouldn’t have approved the comment. Either you failed to notice that you did the same thing you’re criticizing Andy for or enjoy leading a hypocritical lifestyle. Not sure.

    1. I was correcting the record. 2. I had said that “other bloggers don’t normally appreciate this behavior”. Do I have to diagram that sentence fragment for you? 3. Nice insult. Too bad it doesn’t apply.

    Andy Laverdure - do you enjoy being a “me too” attack dog? Say something with substance for a change.

    [ # 2082 ] Comment from Andy L. [May 26, 2007, 6:59 pm]

    likwidshoe. I have been making substantial comments all along. You just refuse to see the comments as substantial, or you pick and choose what you want to respond to . Rob Port has you trained well, to selectively choose what to attack. Your tactics grow tiring. At least with Seth, you can have a decent conversation, once in a while. If you don’t constantly interfere.

    [ # 2083 ] Comment from likwidshoe [May 26, 2007, 7:49 pm]

    Oh yes Andy. Rob has “trained” me.

    I guess that was an example of one of your “substantial comments”.

    [ # 2086 ] Comment from Andy L. [May 27, 2007, 6:07 pm]

    lik. Wow, what a come back. Are you in a hurry or something?

    [ # 2087 ] Comment from likwidshoe [May 27, 2007, 6:17 pm]

    “A come back”? I won’t engage in your school-yard taunts.

    According to Andrew Laverdure, suggesting the use of the Firefox Internet browser is “so sick” and “hateful”.

    Just something to keep in mind the next time one hears him label someone a “racist” or a “bigot”.